By Dan Gronwald, on May 13th, 2011 #CarlJung #Quotes #Dreams
Every interpretation is an hypothesis, an attempt to read an unknown text. An obscure dream, taken in isolation, can hardly ever be interpreted with any certainty. For this reason I attached little importance to the interpretation of single dreams. A relative degree of certainty is reached only in the interpretation of a . . . → Read More: Jung: Dream Interpretation is a Hypothesis
By Dan Gronwald, on May 13th, 2011 #CarlJung #Quotes #Dreams
I leave theory aside as much as possible when analyzing dreams–not entirely, of course, for we always need some theory to make things intelligible. It is on the basis of theory, for instance, that I expect dreams to have a meaning. I cannot prove every case that this is so, for there . . . → Read More: Jung on Not Using a Dream Theory
By Dan Gronwald, on April 30th, 2011 #CarlJung #quotes #dreams
Everyone who analyzes the dreams of others should constantly bear in mind that there is no simple and generally known theory of psychic phenomena, neither with regard to their nature, nor to their causes, nor to their purpose. We therefore possess no general criterion of judgment. We know that there are all . . . → Read More: Jung: There is No Dream Theory, per se
By Dan Gronwald, on April 29th, 2011 #CarlJung #quotes #dreams
The psychological context of dream-contents consists in the web of associations in which the dream is naturally embedded. Theoretically we can never know anything in advance about this web, but in practice it is sometimes possible, granted long enough experience. Even so, careful analysis will never rely too much on technical rules; . . . → Read More: Jung: How Meaning Emerges from Dreams
By Dan Gronwald, on April 29th, 2011 #CarlJung #quotes #dreams
One would do well to treat every dream as though it were a totally unknown object. Look at it from all sides, take it in your hand, carry it about with you, let your imagination play round it, and talk about it with other people. Primitives tell each other impressive dreams, in . . . → Read More: Jung: How to Treat Dreams
By Dan Gronwald, on April 19th, 2011 #CarlJung #quotes #dreams
The dream is often occupied with apparently very silly details, thus producing an impression of absurdity, or else it is on the surface so unintelligible as to leave us thoroughly bewildered. Hence we always have to overcome a certain resistance before we can seriously set about disentangling the intricate web through patient . . . → Read More: Jung: Dreams Have a Meaning
By Dan Gronwald, on April 18th, 2011 #JosephCampbell #quote #Mythology
A mythologically grounded culture presents you with symbols that immediately evoke your participation; they are all vital, living connections, and so they link you both to the underlying mystery and to the culture itself. Yet when that culture uses symbols that are no longer alive, that are no longer effective, it cuts . . . → Read More: The Way to Find Your Own Myth
By Dan Gronwald, on April 11th, 2011 #JosephCampbell #quotes #Mythology #dreams
Now, that’s the big thing, to activate your imagination somehow. You can do this by taking suggestions from somebody else. You must find that which your own unconscious wants to meditate on. With his imagination activated, Jung found all kinds of new fantasies coming, dreams of all kinds. He began making . . . → Read More: Jung’s Discovery of His Myth
By Dan Gronwald, on January 27th, 2011 And so, with reference, now, to our problem of the symbol, we may say that a symbol, like everything else, shows a double aspect. We must distinguish, therefore, between the “sense” and the “meaning” of the symbol. It seems to me perfectly clear that all the great and little symbolical systems of the past functioned . . . → Read More: The New Mandala – symbol and meaning.
By Dan Gronwald, on January 27th, 2011 Some minds require mescalin to dissolve in them their references; others may be quelled by the hypnotizing beat of a drum or the rhythmical organization of a work of art. (For example, which of us ever looked, really, at an old pair of shoes until they were shown to us by Van Gogh?) Certain religious . . . → Read More: The Symbol without meaning: art and science
|
|